theidea.bz

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

To use LaTeX:
Put your LaTeX-marked up math between 'tex' tags, like this but with no spaces in the tags:
[ tex] \frac{1}{k^2}= \pi^2[/tex ]

Author Topic: My model of the atom, based on the work of Milo Wolff.  (Read 2881 times)

Aireal

  • Apprentice
  • **
  • Posts: 14
My model of the atom, based on the work of Milo Wolff.
« on: November 02, 2006, 12:14:32 PM »
There are a lot of theories based on Milo's work, here is my humble attempt.

My theory of the atom.

The Electron.

Any discussion of the atom must start with the electron. I use this description of the electron by Milo Wolff. http://www.quantummatter.com/body_point.html  

Milo gives a description of the electron as a Standing Wave Center formed by the intersection of two scalar waves. These are referred to as the In Wave and the Out Wave. The only addition I can make to Milo's electron happens after it's creation, Milo only dealt with how it was created.

As Milo pointed out, the Standing wave center will have a higher energy density which is the observed energy density of the electron. The out wave of the electron starts at the center and will encounter a change in energy density at the boundary of the Standing Wave Center. This will cause partial reflection of wave energy at the boundary, creating its own In Wave. The partly self sustaining action of this process accounts for the electrons more particle like behavior.

The Obit of the Electron.

Bohr defined the orbit of the electron as a result of the angular momentum of the electron. It can also be described with Mach's equation. http://www.wbabin.net/wahlin/wahlin.htm

This gives us a slightly different picture. The electron is not at rest in its orbit. The electrons orbit matches a wave node so that the energy gained and lost by In and Out Waves equal each other.

Bohr's method can be considered the electrons Out Wave to the universe, describing its current internal state.

Mach's method then is the electrons In Wave from the universe, adjusting its current internal state to match current conditions.

Mach's method shows that as the mass of the atom increases, the angular momentum of the electron will change, affecting its orbit. This is why Bohr's method when used alone, did not work with larger atoms. Mach's method provides a way for the electron to adjust to changes in mass within the atom. Without the In and Out waves of Milo's electron, Mach's method would not work.

The Nucleus

Protons and Neutrons are composed of quarks. Quarks are sub-harmonics of the electron wave. The electron's wave would have its amplitude changed when entering a denser region of space. Any Standing Wave Centers formed at this time would reflect the change in amplitude. This is why they have 1/2 spin like the electron, and why there are anti versions of every quark. This also accounts for their fractional charge in relation to the electron. Asymptotic freedom and quark confinement are explained also, for details see my paper here. http://www.physics-philosophy-metaphysics.com/forum/what-is-a-proton-quarks-a-w-s-m-approach-vt483.html it is a work in progress, but a good start.

More importantly, it shows where all the anti-matter went to. Milo showed how, and experiments confirm pair production, so where are all the positrons? They still exist as the positively charged quarks in their sub-harmonic form.

Let me know what you think of this work in progress.
Logged

clyde

  • Guest
Re: My model of the atom, based on the work of Milo Wolff.
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2006, 10:31:37 PM »
Um... what?

Any useful theory of this sort requires math, clear(er) language, and pictures help a lot too! Lots of things weren't clearly defined. Also, experimental evidence supporting such ideas would be useful in convincing others of the hypothesis' accuracy.
Logged

Aireal

  • Apprentice
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: My model of the atom, based on the work of Milo Wolff.
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2007, 10:21:59 AM »
Clyde

I understand your point, this was just a post to generate some interest and not meant to be a scientific paper submitted for review.

Also I did not know if this forum could support the use of high level math within the post.

I gave links for those who wished to explore the math behind it so more.

Also the length of the post is important. My paper that this post was based on runs over 10 pages in length, a little much for a forum posting. If all supporting evidence were to be included, who knows how long it would be.

Sorry I did not put in enough detail, maybe I should rewrite it, add some more detail, but still try to keep down the length.
Logged

Ryan

  • Global Moderator
  • Professor
  • *****
  • Posts: 533
    • WWW
Re: My model of the atom, based on the work of Milo Wolff.
« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2008, 11:16:35 PM »
FYI, I just added a mod to do latex, (which is used for the math in professional papers) here's a test:
\lim_{n \to \infty}\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k^2}= \frac{\pi^2}{6}
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »