Hi
I would like to propose the term "Whole" for the starting point of the t.o.e.
As a first position , it is perfect for preserving , causality, thermodynamics,time,space and every other action.
It does not attempt to describe particles or behaviours that we see in current study,since for us to use something we can actually perceive, such as wave , string, or expansion theory, we need to look at what is happening now , as we measure it now , in order to create a theory.
Where did this come from
I have just been working on 'first causality' as a singularity. However , it was brilliant for the t.o.e but ONLY if you ignored , it's medium,motion and what occupies the positions that it does not.The concept was that the particle occupy every position in space at once. That there was one (Smallest particle) which had great enough energy to occupy the universe. The particle occurrence was how we perceived time and motion. The killer was in fact the very first change in position. If a single particle WAS everything, there would be nowhere for it to go.
Soooooo.........Since a singular particle preserved every law there was , it seemed a shame to abandon it without a good fight.
"whole" looks at the result end of the singular particle . What is a reasonable picture of where energy will go. Time must (because we perceive it along with motion) have a beginning and an ending. So Whole starts at the result. THE END and moves inwards from entropy to the singular particle.
the strangest thing occurred.
In order for energy "not to be created nor destroyed" , The Whole (ending) must contain the exact amount of energy as the singularity. Not only by a measureming of mass, but also by time and motion.
Think of this......If I have a dot, I move it one space. The first dot has not only a differing position in space , but time also. So motion affects time and space equally. EVEN though I moved the same object, it exits in a totally different reality. Even If I don't move it, each occurrence is ABSOLUTELY separated by time.
Now that was one dot. If I keep to the premise that only one dot exists , or ever did, then now I must take stock of EVERY occurrence of the dot, regardless of time and distance..Difficult..? You bet. If you cross section a "universal trillionth of a second". That means everything that has reality in that moment, then the math is huge for my dot to move to each in order to create it. (brings us back to a motion / medium impass.)
the solution lies in working from both ends of time and space. When I start at "the end" , the next step is to take a dot away.Only since I cannot simply destroy the energy or change the amount of space I use, I must account for it. To make things worse, The dot must contain the exact same amount of energy as the "Whole" or ending. How to do this?
Think of a board which has one side black and one white.The board is the "whole". a pixel of any colour (black or white) is the particle.When a particle from white changes to black, an occurrence has occurred. Since there cannot be two occurrences at any point, there can only ever be one foreign pixel on the board. In fact the "board" is only a board if you can see every occurrence at the same time.
There is certainly enough for a opening statement.
Cheers
Iseason
