PatC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> now im no scientist, so please excuse my ignorance
> in places. i am one of those tinkerers that hope
> after much trial and error, a perpetual motion
> machine will appear in front of me. i do respect
> the laws of science, mostly i just find it
> challenging and fun to think out the box.
>
> i need someone to tell me where the loop hole is
> in this idea, (because my feeble physics can't see
> it)..
> A pendulum uses the force of gravity to pull it
> down, and its momentum to push it back up. ie:
> gravitational potential energy is converted to
> kinetic energy and back again. in a world of no
> friction, this would be the only conversion of
> energy. (is this right?)
>
> then lets remove the friction. lets put the
> pendulum device in a vacuum chamber. no air
> resistance. next (now im not sure of the physics
> and dynamics of magnets, so here goes..), where
> the pendulum would usually connect to the pivot,
> create an arrangement of magnets, such that the
> pendulum does not touch the base yet is still
> suspended from a fixed point. the magnet
> arrangement would not promote nor push the
> pendulum to any resting position, but be
> completely neutral to the motion of the pendulum.
> there goes friction.
>
> can a complete vacuum be created in a lab
> environment?
> surely a circular arrangement of magnets could be
> formed to create the 'cradle' described above.
>
> sorry; by the way, this is not meant to be an over
> unity machine, yet still a perpetual motion
> machine in the sense of the word.
>
> PatC
Seriously Mr. Scientist is the biggest fag i have ever heard. Im sorry. Im sorry, for his parents, whose offspring has grown into such a horribly homosexual person. Please just kill yourself.
Cop killer